Radiocarbon dating revolutions in understanding
 John Woodmorappe has produced an incisive critique of these dating methods.
 He exposes hundreds of myths that have grown up around the techniques.
Unless this effect (which is additional to the magnetic field issue just discussed) were corrected for, carbon dating of fossils formed in the flood would give ages much older than the true ages.Using conventional decay or beta counting, sample sizes ranging from about 0.5 to 10 g of carbon are typical.Each radiocarbon date has a statistical probability shown by the ± number.Although we don t have any 55,555-year-old trees, we do have overlapping tree ring sets back to 67,599 years.They proved this by showing that C-14 dates of wooden artifacts with cartouches (dated royal names) did not agree.ratio having remained the same over the preceding few thousand years.
C) dating is an isotopic or nuclear decay method of inferring age for organic materials.